<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FireStats 1.2.4-stable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.firestats.cc/33/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.firestats.cc/33</link>
	<description>FireStats - the blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 05:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: omry</title>
		<link>http://blog.firestats.cc/33/comment-page-1#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>omry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.firestats.cc/33#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>Hi Allan
Currently this usage of the repository is not supported.
the current release flow is:
* each major version change (1.x -&gt; 1.y) gets a branch for bug fixes.
* when a new version is released, an ant build file is executed, which do some manipulation (version numbers and more), and produce the target archive which contains only what’s appropriate for users.
* I didn’t tag the recent versions (although I should have), but this tag would not have been on build output, but rather on the code in the branch the build was ran on.
I will consider creating a release section that will contain what you asked in future versions.
(IE, http://svn.firestats.cc/releases/1.2.5-stable)
about development files in the repo:
the repository is a tool that supposed to help in the development, that’s why I think eclipse files are perfectly reasonable to be there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Allan<br />
Currently this usage of the repository is not supported.<br />
the current release flow is:<br />
* each major version change (1.x -> 1.y) gets a branch for bug fixes.<br />
* when a new version is released, an ant build file is executed, which do some manipulation (version numbers and more), and produce the target archive which contains only what’s appropriate for users.<br />
* I didn’t tag the recent versions (although I should have), but this tag would not have been on build output, but rather on the code in the branch the build was ran on.<br />
I will consider creating a release section that will contain what you asked in future versions.<br />
(IE, <a href="http://svn.firestats.cc/releases/1.2.5-stable" rel="nofollow">http://svn.firestats.cc/releases/1.2.5-stable</a>)<br />
about development files in the repo:<br />
the repository is a tool that supposed to help in the development, that’s why I think eclipse files are perfectly reasonable to be there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Odgaard</title>
		<link>http://blog.firestats.cc/33/comment-page-1#comment-4983</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Odgaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.firestats.cc/33#comment-4983</guid>
		<description>I want to checkout the svn repository directly to wp-content/plugins so that I can easier up/downgrade and inspect changes.

Looking at the repository (at http://svn.firestats.cc/trunk/firestats/) I am not 100% sure that this is really supported ATM though.

E.g. there are no tags corresponding to release versions and some of the files refer to SVN-VERSION, which I assume gets substituted for the actual version when you make a release “build”.

The repository also has a few files, like the Eclipse stuff, which probably should not go into the public repository.

So here’s a request for making the public repository useable for this purpose.

So presumably when you make a stable build, you’d svn mkdir tags/1.2.4-stable (or similar) and svn cp the files included in that build to this tag, then perform the SVN-VERSION substitution.

That way rather than download, unzip, and move the files to wp-content/plugins I’d do:

    svn co http://svn.firestats.cc/tags/1.2.4-stable/firestats

And when you release 1.2.5-stable, I can update as simple as:

    svn switch http://svn.firestats.cc/tags/1.2.5-stable/firestats

This will even preserve local changes, and also makes it easy for me to ask for a diff between 1.2.4 and 1.2.5 and possibly downgrade if 1.2.5 gives me a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to checkout the svn repository directly to wp-content/plugins so that I can easier up/downgrade and inspect changes.</p>
<p>Looking at the repository (at <a href="http://svn.firestats.cc/trunk/firestats/" rel="nofollow">http://svn.firestats.cc/trunk/firestats/</a>) I am not 100% sure that this is really supported ATM though.</p>
<p>E.g. there are no tags corresponding to release versions and some of the files refer to SVN-VERSION, which I assume gets substituted for the actual version when you make a release “build”.</p>
<p>The repository also has a few files, like the Eclipse stuff, which probably should not go into the public repository.</p>
<p>So here’s a request for making the public repository useable for this purpose.</p>
<p>So presumably when you make a stable build, you’d svn mkdir tags/1.2.4-stable (or similar) and svn cp the files included in that build to this tag, then perform the SVN-VERSION substitution.</p>
<p>That way rather than download, unzip, and move the files to wp-content/plugins I’d do:</p>
<p>    svn co <a href="http://svn.firestats.cc/tags/1.2.4-stable/firestats" rel="nofollow">http://svn.firestats.cc/tags/1.2.4-stable/firestats</a></p>
<p>And when you release 1.2.5-stable, I can update as simple as:</p>
<p>    svn switch <a href="http://svn.firestats.cc/tags/1.2.5-stable/firestats" rel="nofollow">http://svn.firestats.cc/tags/1.2.5-stable/firestats</a></p>
<p>This will even preserve local changes, and also makes it easy for me to ask for a diff between 1.2.4 and 1.2.5 and possibly downgrade if 1.2.5 gives me a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oleg</title>
		<link>http://blog.firestats.cc/33/comment-page-1#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>Oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 06:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.firestats.cc/33#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>Already, FireStats in Russian?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Already, FireStats in Russian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

